There has been an influx of concern for transgender and transsexual people. It has become an incentive for many academics, journalists and governments to parade their progressive mindset for others to see by devoting themselves to providing safe spaces for marginalised groups. LGBTQ is one of those groups, specifically trans people. One of the several “problems” SJW's want to resolve is changing areas for trans people.
It is believed by SJW's that providing unisex changing areas will create inclusivity for the 0.8% of our population who happened to be trans. This is quite an upheaval for such a tiny minority within society but I question it sincerity. Rates within Europe have increased dramatically with the influx of refugees and migrants through the migrant crisis, I for one being one of those victims. There has been a noticeable and alarming rate of molestation, sodomy and rape particularly within changing areas of leisure centers towards young children. These sexual assaults have taken place predominantly by those from different cultural backgrounds.
We’ve also noticed girls in schools are now required to wear trousers in the name of transgender equality, however there is no invitation for ALL children to wear skirts. Is this really about transgenderism? Could the authorities really be so naïve and discriminatory as to not invite boys who wish to wear skirts to do so? Or is there another reason to insist girls wear trousers? Perhaps so as to not offend opposing cultures? Or, maybe to ensure the safety of girls who bare their legs in this new society forced upon us by our governments and bureaucrats?
I have started to question whether the use of transgender inclusivity has been adopted in an effort to prevent more attacks on innocent people, and therefore hide fears of what crimes of migrants and those from opposing cultural backgrounds have been committing. It is no secret that the authorities, mainstream media and government have been actively hiding and ignoring the crimes committed by migrants in our society and continue to do so for the sake of diversity.
So let's assume that my concern is true and that governments, the mainstream media and authorities are disingenuously focusing attention on these minorities as a way of distraction but also a secret application of protection. So now I put it to you, do you believe these huge changes have been put in place for the inclusivity of 0.8% of the population or do you believe that there is hidden motivation through the prevention of crime and the intention of diversity being integrated within our society?