I have a lot of supporters who are from the alt right, and many of these supporters support the idea of removing the woman's right to vote. I personally am not alt- right but rather anti-establishment. It is my suspicion the alt-right is controlled opposition. With that in mind I would like to go down the rabbit hole of taking women's rights to vote away from them and consider where that leads us in the future. Women of an elite class were allowed to vote at one point along with men. These women were often landowners and would be voting due to business and land matters. But regardless, let’s suppose we do take women's right to vote away from them and supposing we did take this opportunity away from women, supposing that was a decision made by men. Let’s consider the implications…
The aim of the alt-right is to procreate white people back into existence because they fear that there is be a white genocide. I suspect if males, the majority in Western society currently being white, took away a vote and freedoms from females then females would stop looking to men, particularly white men, for relationships and families and look elsewhere perhaps to other races in retaliation. For women at this point men would be a species they would not be able to trust and would certainly not want to mate with, and I believe it is this lack of acknowledgement of the consequences of their words that leads me to believe the alt-right is controlled opposition. In fact, the alt-right could become the creators of their own white genocide. There is reasonable evidence to show that is the case right now with what I believe is also controlled opposition with social justice warriors.
It is true there is an opportunity for the robotic womb and it is true that one-day men will be able to reproduce without women. But the alt-right men are also traditional men and therefore presumably, would not want to use this method of procreation but would rather mate with women. This obviously leaves men, particularly white men in a very awkward situation. They would buy now have become untrustworthy due to taking away women's freedoms and they would have shown themselves to be against equality and therefore unfair and inhumane. Women would obviously find this a deterrent and even threat for potential offspring and also become the particularly fearful with regards to their future freedoms and choices, and would therefore fight back to get their freedoms. It is my suspicion that women would stop reproducing with white men due to their mistrust of them. And therefore men, particularly white national men will have created their own white genocide they fear so much.
However, to prevent such a thing from happening they would have three options in order to pass on their genes. One would be to take the automated womb approach. Many may feel skeptical about this approach as it would not be conventional therefore removing the tradition they desire, it would make them single parents again removing the tradition they desire and there could be nervousness about the potential risk of such automated offspring. So secondly the option to ensure white offspring would be non-consenual offspring through the method of rape. There are historical periods where women have committed mass suicide to ensure the prevention of their own rapes. This is obviously a very cruel option and would ultimately see the genocide of the white race through war between the genders. So finally the third option would be for men to have mixed race offspring by having offspring with other raced women. Obviously white nationalist males do not want any of the options laid out, but I believe they are the designers and creators of their own genocide to their race by even raising such extremist issues such as removing the rights for women to vote. This is why I am incredibly suspicious of their objectives and them as a movement.
But let's not just finish here let's take this one step further, let's not forget that in history the men of our country who had no riches and no assets were also not allowed to vote. Therefore, you must question if there came a day when the woman's freedoms were denied to her and they were removed, would such a day arrive for men without assets and possibly lots of debt? I believe that I know the answer to this question but I'm curious as to your own perception. And having heard these arguments I will ask you again what benefit do men have to gain from removing women's votes?